Topic summary
73% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Affirming Care results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 4,774 hits . Analysis detected 37,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,414 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,442 of 16,562 topics). This Gender Affirming Care is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Gender Affirming Care
Topic details
Total words: 27,414
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles27.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.4% 17.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst