Topic summary
71% 11 analyzed articles/videos 6,633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaming Industry results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 4,430 hits . Analysis detected 39,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,111 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (9,891 of 16,087 topics). This Gaming Industry is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Gaming Industry
Topic details
Total words: 32,111
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score11 analyzed articles32.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst