Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Warren results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,076 hits . Analysis detected 8,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,252 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,324 of 6,628 authors). This Tom Warren is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Tom Warren
Author details
Total words: 11,252
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst