Topic summary
35%16 analyzed articles/videos3,736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Interference results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 4,836 hits. Analysis detected 51,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,555 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (10,988 of 15,448 topics). This Foreign Interference is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles43.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Did Trump accidentally declassify proof Russia tried to help him win 2020 election?7%
Snopes.com6%By Anna Rascouët-Paz10%7/23/2026, 11:00:09 AM
Did Biden KNOW that China was in our voter records?87%
News With Views0%By Kat Stansell0%7/22/2026, 3:39:03 AM
How China stole voter registration from 220 million US citizens, according to declassified materials37%
Washington Examiner73%By Kaelan Deese30%7/18/2026, 11:00:00 AM
Red state's GOP election chief blows a hole in Trump's primetime speech scare64%
Raw Story93%By Daniel Hampton74%7/18/2026, 12:50:57 AM
Trump says these documents prove his false claims of election fraud. Here’s what they really say45%
The Denver Post9%By The Associated Press65%7/17/2026, 10:10:21 PM
Intel Docs Declassified by Trump Expose All His Election Fraud Claims74%
The New Republic71%By Hafiz Rashid69%7/17/2026, 1:29:59 PM
Trump Boasts ‘Great Reviews’ of His Election Security Address With Push for SAVE America Act70%
Mediaite70%By David Gilmour60%7/17/2026, 12:48:16 PM
In primetime speech, Trump doesn’t provide evidence for illegal voting44%
WAMU15%By Davetate0%7/17/2026, 8:24:02 AM
Declassified documents undercut Trump’s ‘rigged’ election claim47%
MS NOW94%By Laura Barrón-López79%7/17/2026, 5:03:20 AM
Trump: China Accessed 220 Million US Voter Files, Deep State Hid Evidence80%
The Daily Signal82%By Fred Lucas0%7/17/2026, 2:00:23 AM