Topic summary
35% 16 analyzed articles/videos 3,736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Interference results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 4,836 hits . Analysis detected 51,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,555 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (10,988 of 15,448 topics). This Foreign Interference is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Foreign Interference
Topic details
Total words: 43,555
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles43.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst