Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Fred Lucas results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,025 hits . Analysis detected 11,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,639 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,258 authors). This Fred Lucas is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Fred Lucas
Author details
Total words: 7,639
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.4% 8.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.4% 12.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.4% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst