Topic summary
â 80% 20 analyzed articles/videos 7,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Aid results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 8,779 hits . Analysis detected 52,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,823 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of â 23% (12,263 of 15,769 topics). This Foreign Aid is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Foreign Aid
Topic details
Total words: 50,823
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score20 analyzed articles50.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst