Topic summary
⁠48%4 analyzed articles/videos5,411 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Reviews results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 2,046 hits. Analysis detected 16,434 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,424 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,548 of 16,562 topics). This Food Reviews is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Food Reviews
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.1%11.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos