Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Wilmore results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 1,526 hits . Analysis detected 10,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,179 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,674 of 6,629 authors). This Taylor Wilmore is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Taylor Wilmore
Author details
Total words: 13,179
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.6% 11.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst