Topic summary
24% 8 analyzed articles/videos 8,274 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Assistance results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 3,399 hits . Analysis detected 28,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,656 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (14,554 of 15,149 topics). This Food Assistance is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group. Food Assistance
Topic details
Total words: 45,656
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.9% percentile 1.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles45.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst