Topic summary
84% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flash Flooding results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,616 hits . Analysis detected 4,897 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,880 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,295 of 15,572 topics). This Flash Flooding is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Flash Flooding
Topic details
Total words: 5,880
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.0% percentile 4.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 27.5% 27.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 27.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst