Topic summary
53% 14 analyzed articles/videos 7,028 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Funding results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 4,583 hits . Analysis detected 30,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,026 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (11,504 of 15,651 topics). This Federal Funding is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group. Federal Funding
Topic details
Total words: 31,026
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score14 analyzed articles31K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst