Shelby City Schools seeks public input Monday on federal, state program funding 2%

By Logan Adams1%

7/19/2026, 12:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 36 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (21,554 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the article peer group.

SHELBY  Shelby City School District administrators seek public input on the spending of specific federal and state program funding according to Paul Walker, program coordinator. 
A meeting seeking public input will be Monday at 5:45 p.m. in the David A. 
Jones Little Theater at the Board of Education office, 109 W. 
Smiley Ave. 
Key items for discussion at the meeting are the following: 
 IDEA B Special Education. 
 Title IA  Improving Basic Programs. 
 Title IIA  Supporting Effective Instruction. 
 Title IVA  Student Support and Academic Enrichment. 
 IDEA  Early Childhood Special Education. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Logan Adams: 3.0%Richland Source: 4.3%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 6.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 2.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 6.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.4%Logan Adams: 7.8%Richland Source: 6.2%Appeal to Authority23.4%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 7.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 3.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 1.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Logan Adams: 0.0%Richland Source: 4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

111 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker23%attributed speech85writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Walker • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Paul Walker

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words100% of attributed speech12% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.