Author summary
1%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Logan Adams results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 36 faulty-reasoning hits from 333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (960 of 6,357 authors). This Logan Adams is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Logan Adams
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
85%Logan Adams (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 333
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.9% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles333 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos