Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Jane Tribble results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 364 hits . Analysis detected 2,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,043 of 6,316 authors). This Sarah Jane Tribble is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Sarah Jane Tribble
Author details
Total words: 5,024
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.6% Straw Man: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst