Topic summary
72% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Agencies results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 2,010 hits . Analysis detected 11,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,211 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,795 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Agencies is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Federal Agencies
Topic details
Total words: 11,211
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst