Topic summary
25% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatal Accident results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,644 hits . Analysis detected 9,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,360 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,136 of 16,245 topics). This Fatal Accident is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. Fatal Accident
Topic details
Total words: 12,360
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst