Topic summary
55% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Orders results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 3,494 hits . Analysis detected 34,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,294 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,570 of 15,480 topics). This Executive Orders is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Executive Orders
Topic details
Total words: 36,294
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles36.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst