BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 38.6% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 1,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,516 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the article peer group.

Cementing American dominance in the next frontier of global technology and national security, President Donald Trump signed a pair of wide-ranging executive orders (EOs) on Monday aimed at fast-tracking the development of a scientifically and commercially relevant quantum computer by 2028. 
The directives, signed during an Oval Office event alongside technology executives and cabinet officials, establish a centralized federal effort to unify the nation’s fractured quantum research initiatives. 
By bridging the gap between theoretical physics and market-ready application, the Trump administration intends to outpace global competitors, like China, in a computational race that could redefine cryptography, artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced manufacturing, according to the white house. 
The centerpiece of the initiative, EO 14411 on “Quantum Innovation,” orchestrates a coordinated strategy between the private sector and federal entities, including the Departments of Energy, War, and Commerce, alongside the intelligence community. 
The order mandates the design and delivery of a high-powered quantum computer tailored for scientific discovery within the next two years, a timeline meant to act as a stepping stone toward massive, fault-tolerant commercial systems. 
White House science and technology officials clarified that while initial government-backed models may feature lesser capabilities than the ultimate long-term roadmaps of private tech giants like IBM, Google, and Microsoft, the immediate federal push is designed to “de-risk” foundational quantum technologies and accelerate breakthroughs in fields like biopharmaceutical molecular modeling and clean energy systems. 
The second executive order addresses the severe, looming national security threat that quantum computing poses to classical encryption. 
Since a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could effortlessly crack the mathematical safeguards currently protecting the federal government’s most sensitive data, the administration has legally formalized strict deadlines for a cryptographic overhaul. 
The directive prompts federal agencies and government contractors to completely migrate their digital signatures and high-impact systems to “post-quantum cryptography,” which is encryption algorithms designed to withstand quantum hacking attacks, by December 31, 2031. 
High-value data assets must also transition their key establishment protocols even sooner, facing a deadline at the end of 2030, officials added. 
To ensure the domestic supply chain can actually support this ambitious computational leap, the administration is backing the policy mandates with substantial financial infrastructure. 
The executive orders build directly upon a recently announced $2 billion Department of Commerce initiative under the CHIPS R&D framework. 
This funding features finalized letters of intent to distribute capital across nine pivotal domestic quantum firms, including multi-million dollar grants to companies like GlobalFoundries, Atom Computing, D-Wave, and Quantinuum, to “resolve engineering bottlenecks in qubit scaling and material optimization,” the EO adds. 
Highlighting the initiative’s economic focus during the signing ceremony, President Trump tied the technology push directly to domestic manufacturing, asserting that the aggressive federal investment would stimulate thousands of high-paying American tech jobs while ensuring the nation retains a permanent strategic advantage over its rivals. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.3%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.2%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic8.2%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.9%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.6%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias6.5%This article: 19.9%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 17.7%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect19.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.7%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 38.6%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 4.7%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias38.6%This article: 3.8%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias3.8%This article: 3.8%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 13.6%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias3.8%This article: 9.4%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.8%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect20.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.0%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.1%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 5.0%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority20.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 2.9%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 6.5%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope6.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 5.7%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 21.4%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 8.7%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion21.4%This article: 6.5%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question6.5%This article: 13.6%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.4%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.1%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division5.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.9%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 28.3%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote28.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 8.6%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 11.0%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice8.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 6.8%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

477 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers29%attributed speech339writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageorganization name:white house • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageorganization name:White House • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 45 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words33% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-12.4 ptsWriter: 12.4%President Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-12.1 ptsWriter: 12.1%President Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.