Keyword summary
32%4 analyzed articles/videos6,178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quantum Computing results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 2,190 hits. Analysis detected 18,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,372 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,294 of 37,536 keywords). This Quantum Computing is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Quantum Computing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
17%Quantum Computing (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510016.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate