Author summary
26% 3 analyzed articles/videos 999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rupendra Brahambhatt results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,219 hits . Analysis detected 6,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,676 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,412 of 6,357 authors). This Rupendra Brahambhatt is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Rupendra Brahambhatt
Author details
Total words: 8,676
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.1% 14.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst