Author summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 3,249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francisco Pires results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,339 hits . Analysis detected 8,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,747 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,870 of 6,628 authors). This Francisco Pires is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Francisco Pires
Author details
Total words: 9,747
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.2% 10.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst