Author summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos4,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Hsu results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 3,697 hits. Analysis detected 24,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,437 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,262 of 6,524 authors). This Andrea Hsu is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Andrea Hsu
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
20%Andrea Hsu (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 29,437
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles29.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.6%12.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate