Topic summary
⁠42%5 analyzed articles/videos1,747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Appointments results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 1,450 hits. Analysis detected 9,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,882 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,483 of 16,562 topics). This Executive Appointments is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Executive Appointments
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 21.1%21.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos