Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Gasparino results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 699 hits . Analysis detected 3,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (783 of 6,628 authors). This Charlie Gasparino is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Charlie Gasparino
Author details
Total words: 2,136
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.2% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 32.7% 32.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.6% 22.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.9% 12.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.7% 11.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 32.7%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 12.7%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst