Topic summary
70% 13 analyzed articles/videos 7,490 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmentalism results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 6,993 hits . Analysis detected 52,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,668 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,505 of 16,562 topics). This Environmentalism is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Environmentalism
Topic details
Total words: 38,668
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score13 analyzed articles38.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst