Topic summary
40% 14 analyzed articles/videos 6,573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Regulations results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 3,271 hits . Analysis detected 33,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,936 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,745 of 16,313 topics). This Environmental Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Environmental Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 32,936
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score14 analyzed articles32.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst