Topic summary
71% 10 analyzed articles/videos 5,068 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Interference results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 4,277 hits . Analysis detected 46,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,680 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 38% (9,598 of 15,448 topics). This Election Interference is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group. Election Interference
Topic details
Total words: 35,680
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles35.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst