Topic summary
59% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Sanctions results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 1,855 hits . Analysis detected 23,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,168 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,317 of 15,327 topics). This Economic Sanctions is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Economic Sanctions
Topic details
Total words: 25,168
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst