Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Harding results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 895 hits . Analysis detected 4,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,813 of 6,628 authors). This Emily Harding is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Emily Harding
Author details
Total words: 4,940
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.1% 18.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst