Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DAVID MCHUGH results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,143 hits . Analysis detected 5,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,523 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,491 of 6,628 authors). This DAVID MCHUGH is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. DAVID MCHUGH
Author details
Total words: 6,523
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.5% 17.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst