Author summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos7,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ADAM SCHRECK results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 3,152 hits. Analysis detected 17,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,301 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,467 of 6,244 authors). This ADAM SCHRECK is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
ADAM SCHRECK
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
13%ADAM SCHRECK (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 28,301
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

12% percentile
025507510012.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles28.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate