Topic summary
68% 14 analyzed articles/videos 13,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Inequality results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 8,444 hits . Analysis detected 74,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 58,581 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,508 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Inequality is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Economic Inequality
Topic details
Total words: 58,581
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score14 analyzed articles58.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst