Author summary
100% 1 analyzed article/video 1,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Moscrop results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.4% saturation with 1,621 hits . Analysis detected 10,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,570 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (485 of 6,347 authors). This David Moscrop is worse (more manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. David Moscrop
Author details
Total words: 3,570
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.4% percentile 8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 43.4% 43.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 45.4% 45.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 28.9% 28.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 18.3% 18.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 30.0% 30.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 19.3% 19.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.4% 10.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 45.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 43.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 30.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 28.9%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 19.3%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 18.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 11.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 10.4%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst