Topic summary
⁠92%4 analyzed articles/videos5,860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eating Disorders results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 2,870 hits. Analysis detected 25,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,304 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,221 of 15,769 topics). This Eating Disorders is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Eating Disorders

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos