Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nikesh Shukla results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 1,632 hits . Analysis detected 9,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,268 of 6,629 authors). This Nikesh Shukla is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. Nikesh Shukla
Author details
Total words: 12,024
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.6% 13.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst