Author summary
83% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Poppy Sowerby results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 4,660 hits . Analysis detected 26,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,784 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,570 of 6,363 authors). This Poppy Sowerby is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Poppy Sowerby
Author details
Total words: 18,784
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.8% 24.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 21.8% 21.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.7% 14.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 21.8%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst