Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dna results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,002 hits. Analysis detected 5,685 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,541 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (11,276 of 15,366 topics). This Dna is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos