Topic summary
⁠31%3 analyzed articles/videos2,677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Science results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 652 hits. Analysis detected 7,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,902 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,669 of 16,236 topics). This Data Science is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Data Science
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,902
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos