Author summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mona Sloane results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 416 hits . Analysis detected 2,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,799 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,046 of 6,363 authors). This Mona Sloane is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Mona Sloane
Author details
Total words: 2,799
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.9% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst