Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 873 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Esther Quintanilla results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and False Dilemma , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 535 hits . Analysis detected 2,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,619 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,085 of 6,628 authors). This Esther Quintanilla is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Esther Quintanilla
Author details
Total words: 2,619
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.6% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 20.4% 20.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst