Topic summary
⁠10%4 analyzed articles/videos1,600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyclosporiasis Outbreak results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 1,093 hits. Analysis detected 8,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,836 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (15,084 of 15,778 topics). This Cyclosporiasis Outbreak is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Cyclosporiasis Outbreak
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751004.4% percentile
1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos