Taco Bell takes extra cyclospora precautions while CDC investigates outbreak 32%

By Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert45%

7/14/2026, 11:39:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 888 faulty-reasoning hits from 504 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (14,578 of 21,194 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the article peer group.

Taco Bell removed some menu ingredients in select locations to prevent possible cyclospora exposure. 
The CDC is investigating a parasitic outbreak linked to contaminated fresh produce in 31 states. 
Taco Bell's precautions exceed CDC guidance for preventing cyclosporiasis from contaminated produce. 
Taco Bell is taking a more aggressive approach to protecting against cyclospora than federal health officials currently recommend, temporarily pulling some ingredients from select restaurants while the CDC investigates a multistate outbreak. 
The fast-food chain told Business Insider on Tuesday it has "voluntarily and temporarily" removed certain ingredients from menus at select restaurants as a precautionary measure given the outbreak of the diarrheal illness . 
Taco Bell said the move is precautionary. 
Health officials have not confirmed a link between the parasite and Taco Bell, any specific ingredient, supplier, restaurant, or retailer. 
The spokesperson for Taco Bell did not respond to questions about which specific products were removed or which restaurants were affected. 
Cases have been reported in 31 states since May 1 and are suspected of being linked to contaminated fresh produce, particularly leafy greens and herbs. 
Social media posts from customers at some Midwest Taco Bell locations indicate that lettuce, cilantro, onions, tomatoes, and mixtures thereof, such as guacamole and pico de gallo, are temporarily unavailable. 
The move goes a step beyond current CDC guidance, which advises consumers to thoroughly wash produce before consumption but adds that there is no guaranteed way to avoid cyclospora because it's often impossible to know whether fresh produce was contaminated. 
"The health and safety of our guests is our top priority," a Taco Bell spokesperson said in a statement. 
"While authorities continue their broader review, Taco Bell has voluntarily and temporarily removed limited ingredients at select restaurants as a precautionary measure." 
The caution reflects the high stakes for restaurant chains when foodborne illness outbreaks become linked to their brands. 
Chipotle spent years recovering after its 2015 E. coli and subsequent food safety crises hammered sales and customer confidence. 
Taco Bell has also weathered major outbreaks before: In 2006, an E. coli outbreak sickened dozens of people across the Northeast and was ultimately traced to contaminated produce in its supply chain, prompting widespread scrutiny of the brand. 
Taco Bell did not say what prompted the precautionary removals beyond the ongoing public health investigation, and federal officials have not publicly identified any restaurant chain as the source of the outbreak. 
The CDC did not immediately reply to a request for comment. 
The latest round of precautions is tied to a CDC investigation into a multistate outbreak of cyclosporiasis, an illness caused by exposure to the microscopic Cyclospora cayetanensis parasite, which can cause prolonged watery diarrhea, fatigue, stomach cramps, and other gastrointestinal symptoms. 
Business Insider previously reported that public health experts suspect contaminated fresh produce is the cause of the outbreaks because cyclospora is most commonly spread through food or water contaminated with the parasite. 
The illness is treatable with antibiotics, but can last for weeks without treatment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 3.4%Business Insider: 2.3%Confirmation Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 30.6%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 6.3%Business Insider: 3.4%Availability Heuristic30.6%This article: 6.3%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic6.3%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.2%Business Insider: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.4%Business Insider: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 5.7%Business Insider: 4.8%Framing Effect10.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 1.9%Business Insider: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.9%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 1.8%Business Insider: 0.7%Status Quo Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.5%Business Insider: 2.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 2.2%Business Insider: 1.5%Pessimism Bias5.4%This article: 18.1%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 15.2%Business Insider: 4.7%Negativity Bias18.1%This article: 4.4%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 1.5%Business Insider: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 2.3%Business Insider: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.2%Business Insider: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.6%Business Insider: 2.7%Halo Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 1.7%Business Insider: 1.3%Recency Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 1.2%Business Insider: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.1%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 2.1%Business Insider: 3.4%Appeal to Authority11.1%This article: 6.3%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 1.8%Business Insider: 1.2%False Dilemma6.3%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.8%Business Insider: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.1%Business Insider: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 7.6%Business Insider: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.3%Business Insider: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.7%Business Insider: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 18.5%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 5.3%Business Insider: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion18.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 1.9%Business Insider: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.1%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 2.2%Business Insider: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.1%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.3%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.2%Burden of Proof6.3%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.7%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 2.6%Business Insider: 3.5%Anecdotal9.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 1.0%Business Insider: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.2%Business Insider: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.5%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 2.6%Business Insider: 1.1%Unattributed Quote6.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 1.5%Business Insider: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.4%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 5.9%Business Insider: 3.4%Biased Writer Voice4.4%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.8%Business Insider: 1.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert: 1.2%Business Insider: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

504 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers16%attributed speech424writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageTaco Bell • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageTaco Bell • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTaco Bell • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageBusiness Insider • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Business Insider

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words40% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-7.8 ptsWriter: 7.8%Business Insider: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.