Author summary
45% 4 analyzed articles/videos 504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,324 hits . Analysis detected 7,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,736 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,186 of 6,382 authors). This Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert
Author details
Total words: 8,736
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.2% 15.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst