Author summary
45%4 analyzed articles/videos504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,324 hits. Analysis detected 7,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,736 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,186 of 6,382 authors). This Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
35%Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,736
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510034.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.2%15.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate