Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Henry Chandonnet results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 201 hits . Analysis detected 1,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,497 authors). This Henry Chandonnet is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Henry Chandonnet
Author details
Total words: 1,860
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst