Topic summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cdc Investigations results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,675 of 16,562 topics). This Cdc Investigations is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Cdc Investigations
Topic details
Total words: 2,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 11.9%11.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos