Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kristine Villarroel results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 316 hits . Analysis detected 1,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,075 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Kristine Villarroel is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kristine Villarroel
Author details
Total words: 3,075
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.6% Tu Quoque: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst