Author summary
12% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erika Edwards results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 339 hits . Analysis detected 2,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,860 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (6,175 of 6,630 authors). This Erika Edwards is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Erika Edwards
Author details
Total words: 5,860
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.9% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst