Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 8,422 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cruises results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 1,959 hits . Analysis detected 15,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,057 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,324 of 15,651 topics). This Cruises is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group. Cruises
Topic details
Total words: 28,057
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles28.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst