Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 927 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Nikel results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Unattributed Quote , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 864 hits . Analysis detected 3,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,032 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,118 of 6,357 authors). This David Nikel is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. David Nikel
Author details
Total words: 5,032
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst