Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video4,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mina Tavakoli results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 767 hits. Analysis detected 2,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (5,671 of 6,170 authors). This Mina Tavakoli is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group.
Mina Tavakoli
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
9%Mina Tavakoli (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,600
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

8% percentile
02550751008.1% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos